Talk:Interstate 95

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 3, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Interstate 95 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

U.S. Roads: Interstates Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Types
	Interstate Highway System
	Article recognition
	This article was the selected article of the U.S. Roads Portal in June through October 2006.
	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in April 1, 2013.
	Notes and alerts
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article does not require a junction list.

"I-95 exit list" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect I-95 exit list has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 3 § I-95 exit list until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I-16

I'm curious what the reason is for listing I-16 in the infobox when I-26, I-91 or I-93 are not. All three are longer than I-16, two of the three terminate at I-95 while I-16 does not, and all are actual interstates that actually travel through multiple states while I-16 does not. ~~ Jessintime (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jessintime: the selection of junctions for the infobox is more of an art than a science at times. In this case, it's there to have a junction within the state of Georgia listed. There have to be some trade-offs to keep under the 10-junction limit, or else the infobox would be overly long. Imzadi 1979 → 16:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And I-91 shouldn't be listed to give Connecticut representation? ~~ Jessintime (talk) 16:25, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]